Just wanna throw this thought into the void. I rarely like whatever music (or much of any other creative) stuff I work on after at least a year of having finished it.

I posted a song about being open playing a part on its creation. I then proceeded to say that I wouldn't give too many details about it, since I'm here to upload stuff and nothing else. I mean I guess if someone wanted to talk or ask me something, I don't mind trying to go out of my comfort zone and chatting, it's just I feel like a slight bit of context for an upload was only necessary.

This may or may not be a post displaying a bit of neuroticism or insecurity on my side, sorry!

Happy Spoopy Month

I wasn't thinking of saying anything else *shrugs*

4 + 1 = 5 songs in a month :o

Hopefully the math is correct

Third song for the end of the month song marathon, if anyone somehow noticed. The celebration is that the temp-ban is over!

I probably should've made some announcement (to the small, quaint, but lovely, audience) earlier, but my brain was being borrowed or some other excuse.

Next song will be up on the 26th!

P.S. Sorry about there being no pictures on the CD icons, but that would take more time than I have

:(

"Reason: Spam audio: Your audio can not damage ears or be painful to listen to. [Was the Creepy Pasta song] White noise, blowing into the microphone, screaming, text-to-speech, etc. doesn't belong in the Audio Portal.

Expires: 20 May 2021."

So expect a songs for every other day, starting on the 21st of May! (Just for that month though... sorry)

If ya can't beat 'em, yeet at 'em (?)

Since the music part is just a hobby, I'll live. However, I'll work with this ban by continuing edits where I can and maybe I'll finally come up with some neat song titles, since I'm dookie at it.

-Eni

I'm fine with a ban, though would've preferred a warning.

I'm fine with being told for how long the ban is, for a piece that was possibly damaging ears, but would prefer to specifically know what one did it.

I'm not fine with being left in the dark, and so rather than getting an automated response that bans for a first offense I'd prefer that it be specific.

In the case however that said ban is possibly for something very old, I'd feel cheated on the premise that automation should've punished me earlier.

In other words, the automated response should get a Blam or Zero Stars. *Edit* (This part is a joke)

I love NG, but I won't stand for a vague warning that doesn't allow for myself to improve.

Just a Note (circa 10/19): I think I sounded like a Karen with this post. Sorry bout that

Can never tell if it's the yokel region I live in, the weather, my ISP having a tummy ache (or being held hostage), or some combination of the aforementioned, but I wish it would stahp.

Drum editing too. I try to make a habit out of testing how audio will sound, via various mediums such as from the stereo of my car, the speakers of the laptop, and earbuds. What seems to stand out the most though if I do minimal editing in audacity, is the bass (and I'm sure I didn't do a good enough job with earlier stuff). As a result, I'd say the less edited things have the bass literally drowning out anything else, which is funny but also makes my ears text me sad emoji's.